Lenovo 90A3A9P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90A3A9P  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130702
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 08:08
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 167
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 208
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
EVGA(3842 2631) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3.94
4% 4.92 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 3.57
4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
28GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 76 96 89 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48% Average
Read 83.3
Write 80.8
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 83.6
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
208GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 70 73 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 31
Write 65
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 69.3
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%
Seagate STM9120817AS 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 30 32 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 10.8
Write 19.5
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 30.4
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HB3DU004GFM8MML16 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90A3A9P Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90A3A9P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback