Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory15.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 14:11
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 169
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 498
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 8594) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 153
Parallax 148
91% 138 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 144
Splatting 115
103% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,713
Write 4,417
Mixed 4,413
1,008% 4,514 MB/s
4K Read 259
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 165
683% 191 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 472
350% 469 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
0GB free
Firmware: 3B01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.1
Write 57.6
Mixed 32.3
35% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
2GB free
Firmware: 1J
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.9
Write 53.8
Mixed 26.5
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
1GB free
Firmware: 0-11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.8
Write 36.6
Mixed 26
23% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
8GB free
Firmware: CC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 111 112 113 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54% Above average
Read 76.9
Write 69.8
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 111
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
73GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 151 169 179 140 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 108
Write 64.4
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 171
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
5GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 48 50 50 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 34.6
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 49.4
49% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill F3-12800CL9-4 Skill F3-12800CL9-4 Skill F3-12800CL9-4 Dimm6_Manufacturer 9905403-02X.A 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.1% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback