Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive553% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V12.1
Memory15.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 11:50
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 111
2-Core 250
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 669
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.4% Very good
Lighting 88.4
Reflection 110
Parallax 94.2
72% 97.5 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 86.1
Splatting 92.5
73% 88.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 49 49 47 46 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
553% Outstanding
Read 5713
Write 57.5
Mixed 115
SusWrite 46.1
308% 1,483 MB/s
4K Read 795
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 7.2
1,216% 269 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 553%
Great: 236%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
19GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 484
Mixed 354
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 39.4
147% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 158
172% 288 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
41GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 90.2
Write 80.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 80.8
49% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD1 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V12.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $349
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback