Packard EasyNote LS44HR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote LS44HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV70_HR
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 09:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 145
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 192
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0514) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.901.4.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qumox 240GB SSD 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 310 324 342 345 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 430
Write 348
Mixed 291
SusWrite 327
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 8.5
55% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 16.4
48% 101 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 69%
SSD 32GB 32GB
9GB free
Firmware: 2016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 72 71 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 160
Write 52.8
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 71.4
18% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2
16% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote LS44HR Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LS44HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback