Acer Nitro AN515-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Freed_KLS
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 04:28
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 191
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 375
51% 378 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6891
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 2.34
2% 9.11 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.78
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,914
Write 704
Mixed 733
243% 1,117 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 47.3
171% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 463
351% 463 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 241%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
247GB free
Firmware: JU001J
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,225
Write 27.8
Mixed 37
785% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 490
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.2
20,910% 165 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.3% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-51 Builds (Compare 3,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback