Asrock G31M-VS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock G31M-VS2  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 02:08
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 63
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 43.9
31% 43.2 Pts
4-Core 45
8-Core 44.3
6% 44.7 Pts
64-Core 42.6
3% 42.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 206 206 209 215 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 184
Write 224
Mixed 200
SusWrite 201
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 18.1
79% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 23.5
27% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 102%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 640GB
521GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 25 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 20.5
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 25
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31M-VS2 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G31M-VS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback