Intel S3000AH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTEL_ S3000AH
MotherboardIntel S3000AH  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090611
Uptime28.6 Days
Run DateNov 13 '16 at 12:07
Run Duration69 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3210
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 24.5
2-Core 49.3
35% 48.5 Pts
4-Core 83.3
8-Core 88.7
11% 86 Pts
64-Core 94.5
6% 94.5 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SiImage 640GB
466GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 128
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.32
55% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S3000AH Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S3000AH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback