HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory11.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '19 at 02:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 350
45% 342 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315
HP(103C 102F) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.56
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 1.87
2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 39 56 36 41 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 454
Write 334
Mixed 25
SusWrite 103
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 6.5
56% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 0.5
72% 169 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 86%
WD WD3200AAVS-00ZTB0 320GB
24GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 52 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 50.6
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 52.5
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 45%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB
2GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 24 23 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.32% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 20
Mixed 13.1
SusWrite 23.6
25% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback