MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory73.4 GB free of 80 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 17:16
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 235
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 728
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 915
57% 915 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 152
Parallax 143
120% 147 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 142
Splatting 112
100% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 209 215 211 220 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 465
Mixed 398
SusWrite 213
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 55.8
189% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 337
258% 350 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 131%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
62GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,327
Write 5,229
Mixed 5,135
1,169% 5,230 MB/s
4K Read 411
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 302
1,140% 319 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 773
DQ Mixed 827
631% 856 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 153 159 153 160 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 454
Mixed 366
SusWrite 156
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.8
195% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 356
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 155 149 156 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 156
Write 148
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 150
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$40
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 122 119 124 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 120
Mixed 122
SusWrite 120
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
203GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 94 91 95 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 87
Write 90.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 92
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 59%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
208GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 274 289 281 293 278 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 468
Mixed 439
SusWrite 282
554% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 41.9
3,438% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.8
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 47.8
4,520% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 307%
Great: 376%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
226GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 276 291 283 296 280 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 462
Mixed 395
SusWrite 284
540% 408 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 33.4
3,204% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 50.3
4,608% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 317%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 80GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
117% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 55.2
MC Mixed 42.7
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback