Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 13:39
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 745
73% 599 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 102
Parallax 88.8
84% 97.9 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 89.6
76% 92.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 329 333 350 355 365 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 347
Mixed 273
SusWrite 338
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 41.2
160% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 135
157% 271 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
85GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 294 294 295 294 294 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 478
Mixed 412
SusWrite 299
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 61.8
210% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 115 114 114 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 95
Write 103
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 114
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 198 199 199 200 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 152
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 196
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
121GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 54
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 58.9
78% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.1
180% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback