Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 10:11
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 228
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 700
69% 564 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8528) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 20.9
18% 22.5 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 25.5
20% 25 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1906 1002 816 810 818 816 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,210
Write 2,036
Mixed 1,554
SusWrite 1,028
382% 1,707 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 77
266% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 887
647% 848 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 270%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
191GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 420 420 452 446 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 450
Mixed 356
SusWrite 434
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 45.8
161% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
768GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 437 428 451 453 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 435
Mixed 407
SusWrite 443
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 55.1
180% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
778GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 166 172 169 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 65.5
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 171
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
107GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 121 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 112
Write 40.7
Mixed 74
SusWrite 121
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 59.7
MC Mixed 50.6
149% 52.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 22.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $905
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback