Asus X411UNV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X411UNV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X411UNV
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateOct 01 '19 at 15:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 106
2-Core 246
78% 176 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 70.2
39% 233 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Asus(1043 15AE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3630
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 16.5
14% 15.3 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 19.2
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S2G 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 93 94 94 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 382
Write 105
Mixed 124
SusWrite 94.3
38% 176 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 15.3
49% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 65.1
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 80.1
64% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
516GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 112 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 110
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 42% Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X411UNV Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X411UNV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback