Asus X411UNV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X411UNV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X411UNV
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 31 '19 at 08:20
Run Duration45776 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 97
2-Core 220
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 295
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Asus(1043 15AE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3160
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 16.6
13% 15 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 0.04
7% 9.34 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S2G 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 151
Mixed 157
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 23.5
87% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 18.2
30% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
540GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 68.6
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 15.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X411UNV Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X411UNV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback