Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 12:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 209
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 433
59% 437 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
9.86% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 18.3
9% 13.7 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 18.5
12% 13.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teutons 128GB 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW190629
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 31 39 29 27 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 408
Write 221
Mixed 313
SusWrite 52.3
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 15.2
107% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 19.5
73% 163 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 84%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB
30GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 20
Write 10.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 10.6
18% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.4
106% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 19%
DISK 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
8.47% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 16.2
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 15.7
22% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B1GQL.C7C0C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback