Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '19 at 21:10
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 341
48% 353 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 72
Parallax 69.9
59% 71.4 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 60.7
54% 67.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 304 388 379 419 367 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 396
Write 408
Mixed 316
SusWrite 378
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 39.5
151% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 256
212% 301 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 101%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
892GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 171 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 160
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 172
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback