MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 23:15
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 984
87% 739 Pts
64-Core 2,703
167% 2,703 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 870B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 123
Parallax 123
102% 124 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 114
Splatting 105
104% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3100 3258 2500 3350 3141 2960 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,178
Write 3,298
Mixed 753
SusWrite 3,052
525% 2,320 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 24.2
98% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 533
450% 646 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 334%
Great: 454%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 840 512GB
248GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 359 371 357 371 376 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63% Good
Read 284
Write 276
Mixed 279
SusWrite 360
68% 300 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 21.3
80% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 50.4
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 69.2
67% 101 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63%
Great: 78%
Amd-raid HP SSD EX920 1TB
426GB free
Firmware: SVN1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 1132 1190 1153 1171 1145 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 949
Write 998
Mixed 912
SusWrite 1,144
226% 1,001 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 44.4
141% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 337
294% 414 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 172%
Great: 281%
Amd-raid ST3000DM001-1CH1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 178 184 180 183 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 98.7
Write 143
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 178
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 108%
Amd-raid WDC WD1002FAEX-0 1TB
527GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 104 102 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 102
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 117%
Amd-raid WDC WD1002FAEX-0 1TB
685GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 103 106 103 105 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 109
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 103
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$193
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 70.3
MC Write 79.6
MC Mixed 65.5
205% 71.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 27.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 180%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback