MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 23:01
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 248
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 982
87% 737 Pts
64-Core 2,713
168% 2,713 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 870B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 122
Parallax 135
102% 128 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 114
Splatting 104
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1417 1432 1772 2111 1927 2179 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 950
Write 704
Mixed 706
SusWrite 1,806
236% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 12.5
65% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 158
145% 229 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 179%
Great: 454%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 840 512GB
248GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 239 282 323 311 290 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 416
Write 339
Mixed 299
SusWrite 280
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 23
77% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 80.8
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 45.4
71% 128 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 78%
Amd-raid HP SSD EX920 1TB
426GB free
Firmware: SVN1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 616 754 908 890 938 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 783
Write 1,055
Mixed 623
SusWrite 787
184% 812 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 30.8
114% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 76.6
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 203
137% 160 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 121%
Great: 281%
Amd-raid ST3000DM001-1CH1 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 159 168 176 174 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 167
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 108%
Amd-raid WDC WD1002FAEX-0 1TB
527GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 102 104 101 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 123
Write 104
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 101
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 117%
Amd-raid WDC WD1002FAEX-0 1TB
685GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 103 103 95 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 77.1
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 99.2
60% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$193
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
176% Outstanding
MC Read 70.2
MC Write 76.1
MC Mixed 65.2
201% 70.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 27
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 176%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback