Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 22:29
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 178
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 359
49% 362 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Dell(1028 0577) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.38
2% 1.65 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.76 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suneast SE800 256GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 459 463 453 412 357 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 482
Write 451
Mixed 416
SusWrite 432
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 39
126% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
822GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 458 463 452 451 451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 443
Mixed 386
SusWrite 453
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 35.5
117% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 129
158% 279 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,711 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback