Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '19 at 06:48
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 1,466 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 131 58% 92.4 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 441 44% 348 Pts	64-Core 556 37% 556 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 39,370 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	Lighting 32.3 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 29.1 8% 31.4 fps	MRender 31.4 Gravity 33.7 Splatting 33.5 10% 32.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$85 8,323 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 116 131 132 133 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 980 Write 609 Mixed 156 SusWrite 141 103% 471 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 61.5 197% 64.9 MB/s	DQ Read 416 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 317 220% 284 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 106%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$84 56,307 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 159 159 157 160 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 155 Write 159 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 158 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 110%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$33 9,929 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 45GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 38 37 38 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 48 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 38.2 30% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 4x4GB 377 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 30.5 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 8.8 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 46%

Yacht

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 952 samples	40x
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 94%, 942 samples	30x
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 377 samples	24x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28