Lenovo 43512E6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 43512E6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140521
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	May 02 '21 at 23:20
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 171 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 483 50% 400 Pts	64-Core 486 30% 486 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 188 177 171 150 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 384 Write 252 Mixed 183 SusWrite 176 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 23.3 85% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 120 122% 200 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 128GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 116 Write 106 Mixed 55 SusWrite 81.7 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5 4 4.8 5.4 4.9 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 11 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4.7 10% 8.68 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 6%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 34GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 70 75 88 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 91 Write 88.7 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 72.2 94% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 4x4GB 676 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.3% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 16.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.1 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 43512E6 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Lenovo 43512E6

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	15x
Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	2x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
P3-128 128GBBench 63%, 3,189 samples	2x
MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 83%, 1,792 samples	2x

RAM
18JSF51272AZ- 4x4GBMicronBench 87%, 29 samples	3x
36JSF2G72PZ-1 4x16GBMicronBench 88%, 100 samples	2x
HMT42GR7BFR4C 1x16GBHynixBench 32%, 10 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $733

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16