Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 17:49
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 25.5 GHz, turbo 25.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 239
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 766
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3365) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 152
Parallax 143
122% 148 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 145
Splatting 115
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
459GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 1087 1078 1084 1076 1055 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,354
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 1,090
396% 1,769 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 68.1
220% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 644
463% 600 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 255%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMK8GX4M2A2800C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMK8GX4M2A2800C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 24GB
2802, 2802, 2802, 2802, 2802, 2802 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 40.4
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 23.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback