PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 5900 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150212 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 24 '19 at 08:44 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1225 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 12 20 29 33 30 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145
3GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 59 57 58 MB/s
|
31.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
264GB free, PID 3321
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 31 32 32 MB/s
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3 1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |