Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '19 at 07:21
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 82.6 1-Core 153 2-Core 303 97% 180 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 873 82% 681 Pts	64-Core 1,102 68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 2057 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78% Very good	Lighting 104 Reflection 92 Parallax 86.2 85% 94 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 84.1 Splatting 81.8 65% 79.2 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 350GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1780 1000 822 825 829 830 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	308% Outstanding	Read 2608 Write 1,867 Mixed 1,717 SusWrite 1,014 402% 1,801 MB/s	4K Read 70.2 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 97.5 324% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 814 DQ Write 998 DQ Mixed 908 684% 907 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 308% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V-Color TL48G32S8KSRGB16 2x8GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 35.4 90% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 34.2 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,652x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,264x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $129Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,415x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,238x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,077x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	725x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $935

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16