Lenovo 43192NU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 43192NU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 43192NU
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101027
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 17:41
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 79.8
45% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 202
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M
Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 1.28
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 3.52
3% 3.89 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 170 84 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 222
Write 166
Mixed 192
SusWrite 120
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 17.2
57% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 142
113% 158 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 95%
SSD 120GB
103GB free
Firmware: SBFM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 225 216 219 217 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 225
Write 210
Mixed 183
SusWrite 220
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 17
62% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 145
117% 165 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43192NU Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 43192NU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback