Lenovo 43192NU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 43192NU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 43192NU
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 05:10
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 60.6
38% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 151
17% 134 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M
Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Lighting 2.87
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 1.28
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.57
3% 3.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 220 111 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.8% Average
Read 224
Write 199
Mixed 192
SusWrite 134
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 15.9
55% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 139
114% 162 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 95%
SSD 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: SBFM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 224 217 216 218 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 219
Write 172
Mixed 189
SusWrite 218
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 16.5
64% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 144
116% 163 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43192NU Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 43192NU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback