Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2815 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	31.8% Below average	Memory 57.1 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 40.2 28% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 40.4 8-Core 40.4 5% 40.4 Pts	64-Core 40 2% 40 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Clevo(1558 5470) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.88 0% 0.65 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2OAC90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 65 60 69 67 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 97.8 Write 94 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 65.3 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905594-001.A00G 1x2GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3520IntelBench 34%, 2,090 samples	3x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	5x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 1x4GBCrucialBench 24%, 1,341 samples	2x
1x2GBAdataBench 19%, 409 samples	1x

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $221

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16