Microelectronics G352

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G352  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z370-P
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 00:38
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 278
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 910
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.6% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 133
Parallax 125
100% 127 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 121
Splatting 103
87% 106 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 314 305 292 283 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 405
Mixed 364
SusWrite 300
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 56.1
199% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 86.6
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 320
209% 238 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
68GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 457 462 472 471 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 472
Mixed 445
SusWrite 466
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.1
190% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 54.7
126% 261 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
129GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 351 298 299 297 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 489
Mixed 444
SusWrite 334
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 60.7
208% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
267% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
451GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 40
Write 39.2
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 41.5
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 99%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
28GB free, PID 00ed
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 20 19 18 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 111
Write 20.3
Mixed 19
SusWrite 17.4
41% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 20.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 23.1
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G352 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Microelectronics G352

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback