Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170X-UD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 21:26
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 438
53% 409 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 187
Parallax 184
139% 181 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 175
Splatting 124
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 425 437 325 90 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 465
Mixed 393
SusWrite 296
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 63.1
212% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
252GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 427 444 465 466 465 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 469
Mixed 443
SusWrite 447
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 61.7
209% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
884GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 201 200 199 201 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 96.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 200
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
373% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
133GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 80 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 62
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 79.1
98% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 49%
WD 3200AAC External 320GB
24GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 37.5
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 40.5
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback