Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2778-C1
Memory	18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111219
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '19 at 21:14
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	63%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 83.1 1-Core 60.2 2-Core 106 53% 83.1 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 230 25% 200 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.5% Very good	Lighting 89.4 Reflection 108 Parallax 93.7 73% 97.1 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 89.7 Splatting 98.1 78% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 896GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 166 115 69 73 74 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 99.2 Write 103 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 105 22% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 8.3 39% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 88.7 DQ Mixed 73.2 65% 100 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 657GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 154 163 147 163 178 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 20 Write 44.5 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 147 43% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 13.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M470-2 Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2

CPU
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	29x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	22x
Xeon W3530Intel $287Bench 65%, 5,773 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x

SSD
600 480GBSeagate $199Bench 84%, 1,254 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	29x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	25x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16