PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D2778-C1 |
Memory | 18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111219 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 21 '19 at 21:11 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$108
917GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 148 153 141 139 140 MB/s
|
23.9%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 46 43 43 47 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 29x |
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 22x |
Xeon W3530Intel $290Bench 65%, 5,773 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 13x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $397 |