Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 09:28
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 101
52% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 363
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI 9650SE-12ML 1TB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 65 69 56 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI 9650SE-12ML 2TB
58GB free
Firmware: 4.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 90 87 89 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
IBM ServeRAID M5015 599GB
542GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 58 56 58 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
Read 134
Write 39
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 57.6
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback