HP p6710f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP p6710f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 00:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 415e
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 72.9
40% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 106
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 131 131 128 150 160 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.6% Average
Read 212
Write 158
Mixed 174
SusWrite 140
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 19.9
69% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 135
102% 137 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
377GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 119 119 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68% Good
Read 119
Write 114
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA160B.C8FE CT25664BA160B.C8FE 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6710f Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6710f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback