HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP ZBook Studio G5 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8427
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '19 at 23:48
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2186M 1,418 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 124 2-Core 234 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 175 34% 231 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 4,738 User benchmarks, average bench 28% HP(103C 8429) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.86 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.1% Poor	Lighting 29.8 Reflection 26 Parallax 30 24% 28.6 fps	MRender 31.6 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 34.3 26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 31%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 9,737 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 840GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 622 645 897 922 926 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1253 Write 928 Mixed 577 SusWrite 764 196% 880 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 37.8 118% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 533 DQ Mixed 126 174% 309 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 251%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GB 443 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 25.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 23.9 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

CPU
Core i7-8850HIntelBench 71%, 20,669 samples	259x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	200x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	116x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	406x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	269x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	71x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	151x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $37Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	98x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	79x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	120x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	101x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16