HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook Studio G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8427
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '19 at 02:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2186M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 250
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 563
62% 489 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 8429) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 30.2
25% 29.1 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 31
Splatting 34.3
26% 31 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 532 504 439 420 410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,386
Write 996
Mixed 952
SusWrite 479
212% 953 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 50.2
170% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 76.6
DQ Mixed 48.5
39% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 140%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 27.6
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback