PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181104 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Sep 20 '19 at 22:35 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
75.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 143 58 91 22 89 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
149GB free
Firmware: SW100-30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 56 57 57 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
22.5%
Poor
|
||||
WD Elements SE 25FE 2TB
1TB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 114 115 114 114 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 97x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $639 |