HP ProBook 650 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 650 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2101
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '19 at 18:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 134
60% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 231
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2101) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4139
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-256G-100 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X218
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 133 170 152 200 177 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.6% Poor
Read 138
Write 74
Mixed 76
SusWrite 157
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 5.5
25% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
593GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 53 70 62 68 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 101
Write 54
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 60.6
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.1
98% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH800SO51208-1600 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 650 G1 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback