Asus P5K

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5K (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081014
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '19 at 01:02
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 49.1 2-Core 99.7 48% 74.9 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 191 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 1257) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	8.13% Terrible	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 9.19 Parallax 5.69 9% 8.76 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 9.8 Splatting 5.87 6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.13% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 96 65 35 49 20 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.6% Above average	Read 259 Write 86 Mixed 217 SusWrite 68.3 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 30.1 109% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 71.6 DQ Mixed 38.3 34% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 90%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 46GB free Firmware: 10.01E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 48 58 59 58 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 58.7 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 53.9 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 954 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 23.3 Write 7 Mixed 5.2 12% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 45% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 329GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 26 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 26.2 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 24.2 35% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 1024, 2048 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $65

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	91x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	153x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	58x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16