Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 01:35
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 335
53% 380 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 142
Parallax 131
114% 138 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 135
Splatting 108
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
159GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 385 219 191 211 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 472
Mixed 399
SusWrite 253
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.9
214% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
137GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 279 271 264 261 242 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 457
Mixed 423
SusWrite 285
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 53.2
173% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 175
182% 299 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%
SABRENT 1TB
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 916 988 1013 999 981 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$33
44GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 45 46 47 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 39
Write 32.3
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 46.1
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 1315 BLS4G3D18ADS3.16FE 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 1315 BLS4G3D18ADS3.16FE 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $732
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback