Dell Precision WorkStation T5400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T5400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW203
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '15 at 13:25
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 50.2
2-Core 100
34% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 380
34% 290 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 43% Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2660) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4752
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 30.8
21% 27.1 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 26
23% 28 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 256
Write 65.7
Mixed 83
29% 135 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 9.78
70% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 23.4
48% 100 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
807GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 106
Write 146
Mixed 114
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.53
128% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Raid1 2TB
659GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 86.6
Write 94.4
Mixed 82.2
66% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52%
Great: 100%
Typical Precision WorkStation T5400 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T5400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback