Asus GL553VE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL553VE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VE
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 18 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 579
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3630
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 36.8
33% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 35.7
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian N8 240GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 278 296 298 298 264 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 430
Mixed 399
SusWrite 300
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 51.3
169% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 114
148% 265 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
922GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 116 117 116 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 116
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VE Builds (Compare 1,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback