Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 106 54% 84.2 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 167 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 10D0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	4.64% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 6.03 4% 5.86 fps	MRender 7.19 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 10.8 6% 7.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.64% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G1002 256GB 676 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 196 188 192 194 195 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 420 Write 302 Mixed 177 SusWrite 190 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 29.9 94% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 244 184% 243 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 0420 AO1L16BC4R1-BUTS 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.3% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 13.9 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	481x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	100x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 14 samples	1x

SSD
SD9SB8W256G1002 256GBSandiskBench 71%, 676 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	20x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P2 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 1,759 samples	83x
AO1L16BC4R1-BUTS 1x4GBAdataBench 27%, 361 samples	76x
ASU16D3LS1KBGR/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 248 samples	76x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16