Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100T 2,145 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 100 2-Core 201 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 373 52% 387 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3) 32,403 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 877F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6471 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.35% Terrible	Lighting 7.53 Reflection 11 Parallax 7.59 6% 8.72 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 6.63 Splatting 15.7 10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,436 Write 1,452 Mixed 1,064 294% 1,317 MB/s	4K Read 52.3 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 68 232% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 627 DQ Write 898 DQ Mixed 270 342% 598 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-007.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.4% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 19 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 22 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	17x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	3x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	3x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	3x
CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 41%, 500 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16