Gigabyte GA-Z370XP SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370XP SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370XP SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 279
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 805
85% 682 Pts
64-Core 784
48% 784 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 51.8
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 58.7
42% 52.6 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 41.8
41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1090 844 845 842 843 830 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,625
Write 2,466
Mixed 1,809
SusWrite 882
435% 1,946 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 97.2
330% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,707
DQ Write 1,492
DQ Mixed 1,562
1,181% 1,587 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 332%
Great: 355%
Crucial M550 512GB-$283
290GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 468 466 467 465 468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 465
Mixed 319
SusWrite 466
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 44.4
163% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 228
198% 293 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Crucial_CT512M550SSD1 2TB
448GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 128 128 130 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 112
Write 102
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 129
21% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
7% 2.73 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 180 179 180 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 137
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 178
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
468GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 90.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 107
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
950GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 167 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 102
Write 113
Mixed 30
SusWrite 168
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
384% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
4GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 6.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Read 22
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.1
11% 9.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 859B BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 859B BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 859B BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 28.2
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370XP SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370XP SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback