Notebook P65_67HSHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNotebook P65_67HSHP  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65_67HSHP
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '19 at 18:38
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 227
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 594
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 65A3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3630
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 118
Parallax 101
86% 108 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 93
Splatting 99.8
79% 95.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 576 334 334 305 303 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,492
Write 1,373
Mixed 500
SusWrite 359
207% 931 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 56.9
215% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1,091
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 710
618% 918 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 193%
Great: 236%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
489GB free
Firmware: M0CR050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 465 376 256 257 248 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 388
Write 269
Mixed 374
SusWrite 338
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 40.6
158% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 324
243% 324 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 132 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 125
Write 132
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 129
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 26.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65_67HSHP Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Notebook P65_67HSHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 146% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback