Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180413
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '19 at 14:16
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 207 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 699 67% 552 Pts	64-Core 1,124 70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Lighting 72 Reflection 73.5 Parallax 100 59% 81.8 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 73.1 Splatting 57.7 54% 67.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 302GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1790 1777 1748 1039 664 645 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 1,954 Write 1,705 Mixed 971 SusWrite 1,277 330% 1477 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 57.1 188% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 759 DQ Write 476 DQ Mixed 626 464% 620 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 132GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 483 482 237 78 72 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 474 Mixed 422 SusWrite 305 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 55 183% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 369 278% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 930GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1169 1146 1166 1163 1138 1161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,328 Write 1,163 Mixed 1,136 SusWrite 1,157 269% 1,196 MB/s	4K Read 55.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 70.3 228% 75.9 MB/s	DQ Read 834 DQ Write 615 DQ Mixed 720 539% 723 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 372%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140 12,308 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 2TB free Firmware: 0204 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 383 390 389 387 391 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	78% Very good	Read 390 Write 381 Mixed 376 SusWrite 388 87% 384 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 31.5 102% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 140 108% 148 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 303%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 96 99 99 95 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 42.5 Write 59.7 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 93.4 48% 64 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.4 187% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$179 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 169 170 169 167 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,597 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 285GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 35 35 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 15.7 Write 33.8 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 34.4 38% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.7% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 25 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 22.5 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $549

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16