Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 05 '16 at 16:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 619
66% 524 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Nvidia(10DE 075F) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7563
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 19% Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 496
Write 341
Mixed 385
90% 408 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 15.5
92% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 66.2
77% 123 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
93GB free
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 448
Write 246
Mixed 180
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 11.6
82% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 11
19% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 85%
External Disk 0 3TB
582GB free
Firmware: 1.1593 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 150
Write 100
Mixed 108
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2.49
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.25
157% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback