MSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676)

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7676
Motherboard	MSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676) (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130111
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '19 at 00:15
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 137 67% 107 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 216 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 233 14% 233 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 340X 2,285 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 0083) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	5.37% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 8.65 Parallax 11.1 5% 8.82 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 8.13 Splatting 6.48 5% 6.36 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.37% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 48 72 102 105 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 332 Write 226 Mixed 191 SusWrite 103 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 18 56% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 26.5 DQ Mixed 20.8 16% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 55%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 1,415 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 12 11 13 11 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 7.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 11 11% 9.18 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 44,086 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	61.9% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 21 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676)

CPU
Core i3-3225Intel $325Bench 59%, 3,345 samples	2x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	2x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	1x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x
HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)Intel $15Bench 2%, 6,831 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
SU750 512GBAdataBench 88%, 5,057 samples	2x
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

RAM
99U5595-005.A00LF 4x2GBKingstonBench 48%, 38 samples	2x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 62 samples	1x
991769 (996769) 2x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 171 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $455

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16