Monster ABRA A5 V5.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V5.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V5.2
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '16 at 19:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 228
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 589
64% 510 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
Clevo(1558 0150) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 8.16
5% 10.6 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 6.03
Splatting 8.13
6% 6.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 347
Mixed 404
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 36.9
137% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 103
117% 203 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 112%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
840GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 124
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.21
77% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH800SO51208-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V5.2 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V5.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback