Asus SABERTOOTH P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH P67  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 12:29
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 75
2-Core 136
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 266
27% 217 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 103 97 99 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 161
Write 102
Mixed 128
SusWrite 96.3
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 21.2
79% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 105
84% 118 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
714GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 119 118 117 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 97.8
Write 113
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 118
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-038.A00G 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH P67 Builds (Compare 1,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH P67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback