Alienware 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware 14  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07MJ2Y
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 21:00
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 78
2-Core 36.3
48% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 73.7
8-Core 99.1
11% 86.4 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Dell(1028 05AC) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 18.3
11% 15.3 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 13.3
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DM8110F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 121 134 124 182 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 441
Write 330
Mixed 261
SusWrite 159
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 32
114% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 192
156% 221 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
541GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 115 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 81
SusWrite 116
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67%
Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
361GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 80.3
104% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC64C8HB0NS-DI 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14 Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback